Search
RSS
Subscribe

Enter your email address to receive new posts in your inbox:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Share

Like what you see? Share!

Twitter
Verrill Dana, LLP

Verrill Dana, LLP is one of New England's preeminent regional law firms. With offices in Portland and Augusta, ME; Boston, MA; Westport, CT; Providence, RI; and Washington D.C. Verrill Dana provides sophisticated legal representation to businesses and individuals in the traditional areas of litigation, real estate, business law, labor and employment law, employee benefits, environmental law, intellectual property and estate planning.  The Firm also has industry-focused specialties including higher education, health care and health technology, energy, and timberlands. 

Disclaimer:  The content presented in this blog is for general information only, is not intended to constitute legal advice and cannot be relied upon by any person as legal advice. While we welcome you to contact our blog authors at hrlawupdate@verrilldana.com, the submission of a comment or question does not create an attorney-client relationship between the Firm and you. 

Entries in Medical Marijuana (7)

Tuesday
Jun262018

PODCAST UPDATE: Maine Supreme Court Rules in Medical Marijuana Workers’ Compensation Case

This time last year, Verrill Dana Labor & Employment Attorney Elizabeth Connellan Smith discussed the anticipated decision in the Bourgoin v. Twin Rivers Paper Company, LLC case and appeal in an episode of Verrill Voices entitled, Medical Marijuana: Is it reasonable and necessary?. Among the first cases to address medical marijuana within the Maine Workers’ Compensation system, the case would provide clarity about whether or not workers’ compensation insurers will be compelled to compensate for medicinal marijuana expenses incurred by injured workers.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Jul252017

The Bay State Rules Qualified Medicinal Marijuana User Has Civil Remedy Against Her Employer

Last week, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts issued an opinion in Cristina Barbutos v. Advantage Sales and Marketing, LLC, SJC-12226 (Ma. July 17, 2017), finding that an employee qualified to use marijuana under the Commonwealth’s medicinal marijuana statute had a cause of action against her former employer through the Commonwealth’s handicap discrimination statute.  The opinion reversed the lower-court’s dismissal of the former employee’s cause of action, but simultaneously found that the medicinal marijuana act itself did not contain an implied statutory private right of action.

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
Jun212017

Medical Marijuana: Is it reasonable and necessary?

Verrill Dana Labor & Employment attorney Beth Smith discusses the anticipated decision in Bourgoin v. Twin Rivers Paper Company that should provide some clarity about whether or not workers' compensation insurers will be compelled to compensate for medicinal marijuana expenses incurred by injured workers. Stream the podcast online here or listen below. 

 

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
May022017

Breaking News on Medical Marijuana in Maine Workers' Compensation

We have just learned that the State of Maine Supreme Judicial Court, sitting as the Law Court, has accepted Bourgoin v. Twin Rivers Paper Co., L.L.C., and Decision No. 16-26, one of a pair of Administrative Law Judge decisions addressing medical marijuana that the Appellate Division affirmed last summer.  The Law Court will examine the question of whether the Administrative Law Judge erred by compelling reimbursement for medical marijuana as reasonable and necessary under the Workers’ Compensation Act, despite the fact that marijuana remains a Schedule I drug under federal law.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Jan122016

Tractor Supply Co. Plowing New Terrain in Medical Marijuana Law

Last week, the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico issued a memorandum and order granting Tractor Supply Company’s Motion to Dismiss in Garcia v. Tractor Supply Co. The Plaintiff, Rojerio Garcia, suffers from HIV/AIDS and was using medical marijuana under the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act (“CUA”), N.M. Stat. Ann. § 26-2B-1, to help to treat his condition. Mr. Garcia applied for and was hired for a position as Team Lead and took a drug test, which tested positive for cannabis metabolites. As a result, Mr. Garcia was discharged from his position. Mr. Garcia brought suit alleging his termination violated New Mexico’s Human Rights statute and that the CUA requires Tractor Supply Co. to accommodate his medical marijuana use.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Jun162015

Bummer Dude: Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Firing for Off-Duty Weed Use

In a decision widely anticipated by both employment lawyers and Cheetos enthusiasts alike, on June 15th, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that in spite of the state’s law making it legal to use marijuana, employers can fire workers who partake when they’re off the clock.

Brandon Coats brought the case against Dish Network. Coats became quadriplegic in a car accident and used marijuana to control leg spasms. He had a medical marijuana card and consumed pot off-duty. Dish fired him in 2010 after failing a random drug test. Coats then challenged Dish’s zero-tolerance drug policy, claiming that his use was legal under state law.

Both the trial court and the Colorado Court of Appeals previously upheld the firing. In a 6-0 decision, the Colorado Supreme Court agreed, ruling that the use of medical marijuana in compliance with Colorado's Medical Marijuana Amendment was not “lawful” under the state’s Lawful Off-Duty Activities Statute, because that term refers to refers to activities lawful under both state and federal law. Implicitly, the decision also recognizes the continuing right of employers to set their own drug policies, obviously subject to existing state and federal law.